This arrived in my email with no author name attached. Click to enlarge and read the fine print.
Click to make bigger
For those of us who thought that the new Harbors Director, Mike Formby, might be a change from DOT' usual approach of rolling over the neighbor islands without regard to their desires, it looks from remarks he made to KGMB9 that he's going to give us the same runaround as his predecessors.
Groups like the Maui Sierra Club and Save Kahului Harbor disliked both ideas. One of their main concerns was the impact on surf spots. State officials admitted the changes will affect some of the surfing sites.
"There are many, many problems with safety and just practicality. They are fast-tracking it and ignoring these problems," said Karen Chun, a spokesperson for Save Kahului Harbor and the Sierra Club.
"If they come forward, put their concerns on the table, we have an opportunity to mitigate the impact to the recreational interests as much as possible," Formby said.
Opponents said paddling should not be labeled as recreation but as a key cultural practice. They also worried the plan would make the turning basin used by tugboats unsafe.
"We can come up with a plan that expands the harbor outward which really does set us up for 2030 instead of inward. Basically, they're not looking at what's best for Maui," Chun said.
"I think what we try to do is accommodate the commercial interests and at the same time have as little impact on the recreational interests as we can," Formby said.
In other words, "we don't care about Hawaiian culture - in fact, we're redefining it as "recreation" which we don't care about either."
100 people showed up at DOT's 3 hour meeting. Out of all the speakers who were limited to 3 minutes each) only one supported the harbor plan and his position was that all cultural and recreational use should be eradicated from the harbor.
But where were our Mayor and County Council members?
Two consistent themes emerged: We should not be destroying Hawaiian cultural practices for the cruise ships and superferry and the plan is impracticable and unsafe.
Some of the comments:
Foster Ampong: "What is all this development for? It serves corporate interest. I am kanaka maoli. My ancestors have lived in the Pacific ocean without any help from others and we lived sustainably. Any more expansion will not promote sustainability for the people – it will sustain corporations. We don't need to expand the harbor – we need solutions. Remember, the Hawaiian achieved sustainability we know how to do it. the state government is actually doing the opposite, if you want to promote corporate interests and make the wealthier wealthier and the poor poorer this is the way to do it."
From Mike Commings, long time surfer: "This plan only address it from an economic view, but what are the implications of displacing thousands of surfers, paddlers and kids who are enjoying this instead of rampaging our streets. Nobody can figure this out because there is no formula they can use for this. Pono a really simple word - doing something from the heart, do it right. Past dredging of the surf basin did not create the surf site. 1881 charts tell us reef has been in existence for a long long time. In 1937 Kahului canoe club used Kahului Harbor. Eddie Aikau used to live across the street . I am not endorsing any type of improvement that eliminates these surf sites."
Karen Chun, Save Kahului Harbor and The Sierra Club: "This plan destroys the Kahului Surf Break and the paddler's race course. But you say it has "no significant impact" on cultural practices. You reclassified Hawaiian Culture as recreation. For DOT to define and dismiss Hawaiian culture like this is disrespectful. Only the Hawaiians can define their culture."
"I won't say any more on this because you don't give a rat's ass about Hawaiian culture and you don't give a rat's ass about what Maui wants."
"So I'll speak to you as an engineer with a masters degree from the University of California: This project is unworkable and unsafe."
"The harbor pilots told you that you cannot reduce the turning basin without seriously impairing safety. They told you not to lengthen Pier 2 but you're doing it anyway. You can't put a breakwater along the west side of the turning basin. That is where to tugs go to maneuver the ships. "
"In the 2020 plan the Army Corps of Engineers told you a breakwater at the harbor mouth won't tame the west surge. How are the ships going to make the U turn into Pier 5?"
"This plan looks like it was created by cruise ship lobbyists instead of engineers."
"Our lawyers tell us, 'always give them an alternative'. So here's ours:"
"Make a no-cost policy change of docking freight before cruise ships. Instead of leaving the freighters waiting for days while the cruise ships tie up for 35 hours at a time, switch it around and leave the cruise ships out there until there is an empty berth. This buys us time to do this right so the plan really will take us to 2030 instead of wasting our money on an infeasible and unsafe rushed plan."
Joyclin Costa used passages from the Bible to make pointed barbs at DOT, "As a kanaka maoli we are a very spiritual people. If you have not been trustworthy with someone else's property....” Public law tells you that our lands were never ceded – one of the areas that was not ceded was Kahului Harbor. Whereas the indigenous people never relinquished their lands. I find it appalling that on that chart it states that archaeological and cultural significance is none. You are looking at an extinct specie – a Hawaiian. I hope you can see and hear me because we do exist and we have rights. I would like to take you back to the 1980s in front of Y Hata where a gigantic shark pulled out of the water – that was someone's aumakua. Has anyone asked the families if they have aumakua swimming in those waters?
Kalena Eaton, a young Hawaiian: "I am representing myself and the rest of my generation. I'm speaking like aunty from my na'auo. We are connected to our ancestors, the generations to come and to our land. By taking away our cultural activities you are taking away our culture. I went to school on Oahu and it was a mess from fast tracking. You are taking away a part of our lifestyle."
Hannah Bernard from Hawaii Wildlife Fund and Surfriders: "Tonight I just want to speak from my heart. The feeling from Maui is that we are left out and it is serving Honolulu's needs and not Maui. Who is this for? Will we really have big cruise ships and the superferry in 2030?" She went on to talk about the escalating fuel costs and the fact that economists say that fuel reserves are dwindling which will affect the way in which we use fuel. This will, in turn, affect frivolous uses of fuel such as cruise ships and the Superferry.
Momi Awo: My mom grew up in kahului my grampa was a stevedore. He worked and fished in the harbor Give equal weight to our activities. There is a spiritual connection between the things we do. We live in an island state and when you do your assessment you have to give weight to that. We are all here for the spiritual things that Hawaii gives us and we cannot forget that. When people think of fishing diving surfing padding as recreational they lose their value and that is not right. we need more opportunities to practice the things that give us wellness and wellbeing in a spiritual way. There's a lot of work to protect land and we must expand that to the water. You have a very heavy responsibility to respond to us and to protect those places that will give us continued spiritual wellbeing.
Johana Kamanu: "We don't look at the word land the same way you do. 'aina does not mean land. 'ai means eat or feed 'aina is that which nourishes us and we need to nourish the land so it can fed us. I feel these meetings are just a way a addressing requirements and not a way for us to have a valid statement. I don't feel this is a valid meeting. I can no longer let you folks do what you want to do without some accountability and without letting you know I don't appreciate what you're doing. "
Iokepa Nae'ole: "We get labeled as the vocal minority but where's the silent majority that you say complain about us?" (Looks around the room to the 100+ people all opposed to the harbor plan.) "I pray to Akua that the people building this aren't the same ones who built the 3 lane highway up to Haleakala and the HSF. I grew up in the harbor. In 1974 I started paddling. I found my role models. It's my church. and sometimes its my fish department at Safeway. Instead of watching TV we'd drop crab pots off pier 2, throw net come home with enough mullet to feed the whole street. Recreation is not the proper term for what we do. I could fill this room 3 or 4 times with kids who are pono people from their experience in Kahului Harbor. As a Hawaiian you want to do enough good things that when you die you are 'aumakua. 'nuf already.
Leilani Miranda – teenager, Hawaiian Sr at St Anthony. "You usually don't see students my age but we should see more because it will affect us. I want to know if this is going to affect you guys. Are you guys even going to listen to us? Is this going to even count for anything? You didn't look at us. Are we just passing by?"
And finally, these gems:
"Let the cruise ships cruise...not park!"
"We had No Significant Impact on DOT"
4 comments:
It is shame for the DOT to have to be told by a 17 yr old girl that what they're doing is wrong. It's also illegal paddling fishing and surfing are not recreational activities they are cultural activities and they're not allowed to interfere with cultural practices
State wants "recreation" out of harbor. They are spending 1/3 billion taxpayer dollars to separate passenger and freight - to accommodate 2 commercial corporations - one hugely polluting cruise ship and the soon to be defunct Superferry...they classify surfing and canoe paddling as recreational uses - negating the need to follow the law relating to the protection of traditional Hawaiian cultural practices.
Kicking out surfers and paddlers constitutes Access Denied!
The paddlers related their saga of having to move their canoe hales every few years until they found this promised "permanent" home. They also related that the harbor was the only safe protected place to practice on Maui's north shore and they were more than competitors (7 time state champs)
Iokepa Naeole called himself the original harbor rat "you see this body - it was sculpted at Kahului harbor - "we've kept countless kids off the couch and the pipe."
The harbor is walking distance from the low income apartment complex called Harbor Lights and these kids would be in gangs and on drugs if the canoe clubs were forced to move and surf sites destroyed.
Surfrider wondered about the taking of coral - is the state fast-tracking to circumvent the federal mandated Coral Reef Protection Act?
Pacific Whale Foundation and Hawaii Wildlife Fund said the harbor is home to three endangered species and the EIS does not adequately acknowledge or address.
A Clean Water Specialist had plenty to say. I called for the state to sit down with paddlers and surfers to negotiate an alternative that will achieve the state's goals and continue traditional Hawaiian cultural practices of surfing and paddling.
But this morning received an email from a former county planner who believe that the passenger terminal will pave the way for military on Maui. In fact there was immediate precedent for this: the Superferry was operational for less than a month when it was indentured to transport national guardsmen and heavy equipment for post storm clean up in Kula, Maui.
Karen Chun of Save Kahului Harbor is a former engineer who said the design is flawed.
I stated that the increased passengers would lead to the need for freeways and overpasses.
Rob Parsons, former Maui County Environmental Coordinator, said the traffic study was inadequate because it did not address the impact of traffic offloading on the west side of the harbor.
luvtohike left this comment:
I love the aina but please get your facts straight:
1) Taxpayer money is not being used to pay for the improvements. Money from the Harbors Special Fund, revenue bonds, fee increases, leases, the Fed. etc. will pay.
We clearly said that the cruise ship and Superferry docks were being paid for by raising tariffs and selling bonds. This came directly from Deputy Director Mike Formby.
Our point is that when you raise tariffs across the board, then everyone on Maui ends up paying because those increased dock fees are passed on to us through increased freight costs. Since 80% of our food and goods comes through Kahului Harbor, that means that in the end we will pay for these improvements.
2) I have seen no proof that the cruise ships are polluting, just hearsay. Where are the reports confirming this from the state? The Coast Guard? Even the County? The Maui Cruise Ship Task Force report was not a formal study, it even says so in the preface.
I'm not sure why you think the cruise ships aren't dumping all their sewage in the ocean as well as all their garbage. They admit this. Those of us who use the ocean see it.
It is a fact that cruise ships dump their sewage and garbage into the ocean.
It is a fact that the State had a Memorandum of Understanding with the cruise ships that they would only dump outside the 7 mile limit.
It is a fact that the cruise ships unilaterally broke that agreement and are now dumping outside the 3 mile limit.
Are you saying you think that these statements aren't true?
It's okay to protect the environment, but eh, use facts not emotion!
That is exactly what Save Kahului Harbor does. We use facts. You may not like the facts. But these things are happening none the less.
Luvtohike -
If you'd like to identify yourself and continue this conversation via email, please click on "Contact Us" on the right menu.
I'm not sure to whom I'm talking. Are you employed by the cruise ships? DOT? Superferry? Obviously not the freight companies.
I fear that we are approaching this issue from different priorities and that even if we are able to agree on the facts (and you seem pretty up on these) we'll still be disagreeing on the meaning of those facts.
Most of the residents of Maui value their beaches, surf spots, paddling, quiet way of life and - above all - our Hawaiian culture.
DOT and the cruise ship supporters are thinking only in terms of making money and expanding business. Granted this has side benefits such as adding a few jobs (I'm not counting your 900 crew members since these are in most part not Maui residents and few of our respectable residents would leave their families for the low wages and long times away for one of the cruise ship jobs.)
But while NCL and the handful of activity companies it contracts with are making money, the rest of us are paying for this by having hordes of people trample our special places (thanks, Hike Maui) and thousands of people take Hana Hwy so we spend 30 minutes traversing three miles to get home (thanks, rental car companies)
So we can establish the fact that NCL processes their sewage before dumping it into the ocean but we will still disagree as to whether they should be prevented from doing this at all - as Alaska does.
And we can agree that our freight needs more room in Kahului Harbor but disagree with how that should be accomplished.
You think we should get the surfers and paddlers out of the harbor and build a cruise ships dock.
We think we should get the passenger ships out of Kahului Harbor and keep the surfers and paddlers.
This is a matter of priorities. You value money. We value culture and our way of life.
I'm thinking we just need to agree to disagree on this one.
Post a Comment